Showing posts with label North Carolina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North Carolina. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Senate Elections in 2010: A Look at the Current Makeup of the State Legislatures

There are many "intangibles" that determine the outcomes of elections.However, a good starting point is to look at pertinent numbers: thenone can try to insert the various other factors and try to determinewhat might happen. Last week, I looked at the Presidential vote in thelast three elections in those states that are having contests for theUS Senate in 2010. Those seats that are occupied by one Party while thestate is voting for (or trending toward) the other Party are goodplaces to look for potentially vulnerable seats.

Today, I'm going to look at the current make up of the StateLegislatures in the 35 states in which there will be US Senate racesnext year. In the table below, I have presented the percentage of eachParty in the State Senates and State Houses of Representatives, andthen the average of these two percentages. As before, the first twocolumns are the state and the Party that currently holds the US Senateseat. There are two rows for New York because there will be two racesnext year because of the special election for the seat recently vacatedby Hillary Clinton and filled by Kirsten Gillibrand.


StateState
Senate
State
House
Avg
AKR50%45%48%
ALR60%59%60%
ARD77%71%74%
AZR40%42%41%
CAD65%64%64%
COD60%58%59%
CTD67%76%71%
DED76%61%69%
FLR35%37%36%
GAR39%41%40%
HID92%88%90%
IAR64%56%60%
IDR20%26%23%
ILD63%59%61%
IND34%52%43%
KSR22%38%30%
KYR40%65%52%
LAR56%50%53%
MDD70%74%72%
MOR32%45%39%
NCR60%57%58%
NDD45%38%42%
NHR58%56%57%
NVD57%67%62%
NYD52%73%62%
NYD52%73%62%
OHR36%54%45%
OKR46%40%43%
ORD60%60%60%
PAR40%51%46%
SCR41%43%42%
SDR40%34%37%
UTD28%29%28%
VTD77%63%70%
WAD63%65%64%
WID54%53%54%


Based on this criterion alone, there are six Republican seats and twoDemocratic seats that might be vulnerable.

In Iowa and Alabama, the current membership of the State Legislaturesaverage 60% Democratic, while the US Senate seats up in 2010 are heldby Republicans. In Iowa, Chuck Grassley's seat is up, and at thispoint, it appears that he will run for re-election. In Alabama, thesame holds for Richard Shelby.

The next two Republicans holding seats with Democratic majorities inthe State Legislature are Richard Burr in North Carolina and Judd Greggin New Hampshire. The two states have an average of 58% and 57%Democratic members in their State Capitals, respectively.

In all four of those mentioned above, the Democratic Party holds amajority in both houses of the State Legislatures. There are two otherUS Senators holding seats in states that have, on average, Democraticmajorities, although the Party holds an outright majority in only oneof the houses. These are David Vitter in Louisiana and Jim Bunning inKentucky.

There are only two Democratic members of the US Senate whose seats areup next year and who are holding office in states where theRepublican Party currently has the advantage in the State Legislatures.Byron Dorgan in North Dakota is a Democrat although his Party holdsonly an average of 42% of the legislative seats, and his Party is inthe minority in both houses. The other is Indiana's Evan Bayh: theDemocratic Party holds only an average of 43% of the seats in thestate's legislature, although they do hold a majority in the StateHouse of Representatives.

So, now we have examined recent voting in recent Presidential and StateLegislature elections, looking for potentially vulnerable seats. Theconsistent indicators seem to suggest that the seats in Iowa, NorthCarolina, New Hampshire, North Dakota and Indiana warrant considerationas potential pickups by one Political Party or the other.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

How Good Are Intrade Contracts As Predictors of Senate Election Results? A Look at 2008

A few days ago, I looked at how well Intrade contracts performed as predictors of the outcomes of races for the US Senate in 2006. You may recall that just before the elections, the Intrade contracts pointed to the victors in every Senate race. The same was true in 2008: the contract prices that I retrieved on 30 October pointed to the eventual victor in every race (assuming, as expected, that Al Franken is ultimately the winner).

But again, I wanted to examine how far in advance successful predictions could be made based upon these futures contracts. In early 2007, Colorado Sen. Wayne Allard announced his retirement. In May 2007 when I obtained my first information from Intrade, the contract was already indicated a Democratic victory. Ultimately, Mark Udall won this seat. At the end of August of 2007, Virginia Sen. John Warner told his constituents of his retirement. Within two weeks, former Governor Mark Warner announced his candidacy for the post. Intrade contract information obtained later that month indicated Mark Warner as the clear favorite, and he won election the following year. The third retirement announcement came from New Mexico’s Pete Domenici in early October in 2007. Congressman Tom Udall announced his candidacy almost immediately for the Democratic nomination and the state’s two Republican congresspersons did likewise for the nomination of their Party. By May of 2008, Udall’s ultimate victory was indicated by the pricing of Intrade contracts. At that same time, the Intrade numbers were suggesting the victory of former Governor Jeanne Shaheen over Sen. John Sununu in New Hampshire.

So, by May 2008, fully 6 months before Election Day, the ultimate winners were being “predicted” by the Intrade contracts. The other four Democratic pick-ups were not so indicated until much closer to the elections. By early October, Mark Begich’s win over Ted Stevens in Alaska, Jeff Merkley’s defeat of Gordon Smith, and Kay Hagan’s victory over Elizabeth Dole were indicated by the Intrade contracts. It wasn’t until a few days before the election that Al Franken’s (apparent) victory over Norm Coleman was indicated by the Intrade numbers.
Once again, all Senate races were could be correctly predicted by interpretation of these Intrade futures contracts, and most could be determined almost a month ahead of time. Unfortunately, I don’t have the appropriate information in order to compare the relative accuracy and timeliness of predictions based on the various polling that occurred in these two cycles. Hopefully, I’ll be able to obtain such data for the coming cycle. If anyone would like to help collect such information, I would welcome their assistance

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Some Pertinent Posts on Another Blog

I began examination of the upcoming 2010 Senate elections on another blog, entitled Political and Economic Numbers http://www.politicalandeconomicnumbers.blogspot.com/. I have already looked at a number of the 2010 races – please see those posts as I start putting additional content here. I’ve looked at North Carolina, Ohio, New Hampshire, Missouri, Iowa, North Dakota, Arkansas, Indiana and Pennsylvania in some detail, and a few others briefly.

I’ll start by copying a post from that blog on the relationship between fundraising success and Election Day success in the Senate elections this year.